AZGFD Patrols More Than Deserts and Forests
For sure, the internet is a vast source of information. Message boards like the AHT Forums not only provide information, but entertainment as well. The problem with internet message boards however is that there is no way to verify the information as presented. The boards are full of some very knowledgeable folks; they are also full of Monday morning quarterbacks, self-appointed experts, and some who might have an axe to grind.
This past year, I have noticed “official” posts from members of Arizona Game and Fish on a few different boards, and I must say, I think it is great. Whether you agree with their posts or not, they are tapping into what is arguably the “pulse” of the hunting community and trying to address issues directly.
A great example of this can be found in a recent thread over at the Coueswhitetail.com Message Board. Some people had taken umbrage with some recent proposed tag allotments/numbers and there was a lot of information, conjecture and “fact” being tossed around.
Well, along comes Jim Hinkle who is Big Game Management Supervisor the for Arizona Game and Fish Department and he makes the following, very informative post to shed some light on the conversation at hand:
My name is Jim Hinkle and I am the Big Game Management Supervisor for the Arizona Game and Fish Department. I have twenty-five years with the department as a wildlife manager (Units 18B and 27), investigator, and law enforcement program supervisor. I moved to my current position this past summer and still am getting up to speed. I have recently started monitoring posts on this web site and feel compelled to respond on this topic.
Firstly let me state that forums like this one are valuable venues for all of us to express our opinions regarding the wild resources we all enjoy. In responding to this post, it is not my intention to disrespect anyone’s opinion, but to simply provide the factual basis as to why recommendations were made. Given the facts, it is your purview to decide whether the recommendations were right or wrong.
The Arizona Game and Fish Commission approve guidelines for hunting seasons which directs the department in how game species are managed. The most current guidelines call for a pre-hunt (September) bull to cow ratio of 15 to 25 bulls per 100 cows for standard elk management units. Units with bull to cow ratios higher than the guideline are directed to increase bull harvest resulting in increased permits or hunting opportunity. During the fall 2009 elk surveys, Units 5A, 5BN, 6A, 7E and 8 all had bull to cow ratios significantly higher than the Commission-directed guideline (76, 49, 31, 59, and 49 bulls per 100 cows, respectively). While an increase in permits in each of these units is clearly warranted, the wildlife managers for those units felt that adding additional tags during the November general season would result in too many hunters in the field at one time. Those managers requested a new October season to add the extra permits. December was ruled out for the extra hunt due to fears of rain, snow, mud and possible road closures. As it is our job to provide opportunities for hunters to hunt, we felt the extra season was an acceptable option, and far better than stacking too many hunters in the field at once during November. The newly recommended October season is only planned to be used in these units until the bull to cow ratios are within guidelines, and then the harvest will be reduced and the October hunts will no longer be needed. The bottom line is we have extra bulls in these units; we have thousands of hunters who want to hunt, so we are recommending the additional opportunity. Whether to offer the extra tags in November, October or December was a judgment call. We went with the recommendation of the field officers who felt the extra tags would be best offered in a new October season.
The decision was made on the basis of what would be best for the majority of our hunters, not for monetary reasons. I can assure you that in all of the work in developing a statewide hunt recommendation packet from the district wildlife manager level all the way up to the Director’s office, revenues are never discussed. Permit increases (and decreases) are made on the basis of population parameters, previous years harvest and hunter success, as well as access issues (we are losing 40 antelope tags for 2010 simply due to the closing of the Chino Grande Ranch). Total annual revenues for the Arizona Game and Fish Department run about 90 million dollars. License and tag sales make up 28 million of that total, of which big game permit tags (including non-permit tags) account for a little over 8 million. The addition (or deletion) of 396 elk tags has no appreciable effect to our annual budget. It is only important to the 396 extra hunters who get to go hunting.
If you still have concerns over the recommended October bull elk hunts, please consider attending the December 5, 2009 Commission meeting in Phoenix and voice your opinion. The Commission does listen. I also encourage any of you concerned with seasons, dates, target ratios, weapon types and the like to engage in the hunt guideline development process the next time around. We will begin that public scoping process during the spring of 2011.
Jim
I say “well done” to Mr. Hinkle and I strongly encourage the Department to keep up this kind of outreach and education. Other Departments could do well to follow their lead. Some time spent perusing our hunting and fishing message boards could really reap some benefits!
Posted on 30th November 2009
Under: Arizona News, General, Hunting | No Comments »